Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Senators Warner and Webb Perpetrate An Outrage On Virginia Citizens

In a despicable betrayal of the people of Virginia, Senators Warner and Webb recently voted for the monstrosity of a health care bill in the U.S. Senate. This bill will be a total disaster for the best medical care in the world that we currently have here in America, and this bill is a real slap in he face to the people of Virginia.

This bill is ostensibly for the purpose of reducing health care costs nationwide. But the government has never run a program, any program, in a cost effective manner, because the government wasn’t designed to be efficient. It just doesn’t think that way. Look at the Postal Service, where in my lifetime the cost of a stamp has gone from three cents to forty-four cents, a 1367% increase, or at Social Security, which everyone acknowledges will go bankrupt at some point, despite the many social security tax increases over the years. What about Medicare, which is $37 billion underfunded because costs are out of control.

The Congressional Budget office says the Senate health care bill will cost $2.5 trillion over the next ten years. Let me make sure I understand this: We must spend $2.5 trillion more on health care than we are now in order to bring costs down?

Aside from the cost issue, there is the matter of rationing. There will be rationing of health care under this bill, as there is in every government health care system in the world. In Great Britain, there is a board of bureaucrats that was set up for this specific purpose.

Our very own government run health care for seniors, Medicare, already rations care in many ways. Here is just one example. National Coverage Decisions (NCD’s) are issued by Medicare’s medical staff; these NCD’s define who is and is not eligible for new and often expensive treatments. You and your doctor don’t decide that; the Medicare bureaucrats do.

But the Senate health care bill doesn’t include a government option, we are told. Well, I say that if it looks like a duck and it waddles like a duck and it quacks like a duck, then it’s a duck. When the government passes a 2100 page law covering every conceivable aspect of health care, such as the Senate bill, then that’s government run health care.

In any event, the Democrats pushing for the government take-over of health care know that it can’t be done in one fell swoop. They have to first get the camel’s nose in the tent, and that’s what this bill does. The liberal Democrats fully admit that this is just a start on the road to a complete take-ever of health care by the government. They have said many times that universal government-run health care is their goal.

The promoters of this scheme will say that insurance companies ration health care now, so what’s wrong with the government doing it. The very significant difference is that you can change insurance companies if you’re not satisfied with the one you have, but you can’t switch to a different set of bureaucrats if you don’t like what they are doing.

Oh, and what about the death panels we have been told repeatedly will not come to be? Guess what: They are already at work, a la the government mammogram report that told women not to have a mammogram until age fifty instead of starting at age forty because starting earlier resulted in “too may procedures”. That is, it cost too much to start at age forty, never mind that it unquestionably saves lives. This report was withdrawn after a public firestorm broke out over it, but expect more such reports in the future if we get expanded government run health care.

Something as important as health care, which represents one-sixth of our total economy and which affects us all in a very personal and direct way, should be given due consideration, for as long as it takes. Why does a 2100 page bill have to be passed tomorrow? The reason is that the liberal Democrats don’t want you to have time to find out what is really in all of those  2100 pages, and how dramatically it will affect you.

The latest Rasmussen poll shows that, nationwide, 56% of the people oppose any sort of a government health care bill, and only 40% approve. Why is Congress in a wild panic trying to ram and jam something through that most people don’t want? Maybe Congress thinks they know better how to run our lives than we do. Maybe they just don’t care what the people think.

But the most outrageous aspect of this bill is that some Senators from states such as Nebraska, Louisiana, and Vermont put their votes up for sale. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada then eagerly bought their votes by putting special provisions in the bill that benefit only those Senators’ states. Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana bragged that she was able to extort $300 million for her state from Harry Reid. Senator Ben Nelson of Nebraska held out to the last moment in order to get the juiciest deal possible for Nebraska.

If all of this outright corruption in the U.S. Senate wasn’t enough, our two Senators approved of it all by voting for the bill. It gets worse. Since all of those billions of your taxpayer dollars will be funneled to other states in special programs for those states only, you will pay even higher taxes than you otherwise would under this health care bill if those special provisions were not there. That’s right, Virginians will pay even higher taxes under this bill so that people in Nebraska and Louisiana and Vermont can be shielded from the ultra high cost of the bill.

Senators Webb and Warner agreed to all of this.

Jessee Ring

Dec. 23, 2009

Friday, December 11, 2009

An Open Letter To Congressman Boucher

When I called your Abingdon office last August to schedule an appointment with you while Congress was in recess and you were in this area, I was treated in an exceedingly rude and disrespectful manner by your office staff, one of whom even hung up on me.  I guess this is because I have differed with you substantially on the issues and I have been outspoken in that regard.

My wife has been waiting since January to get an appointment with you. She has made this request to your office staff repeatedly, only to be totally ignored. Never in almost a year’s time has she so much as even received a response from you or your staff, much less an actual appointment.

At the town hall meeting in Dublin, you arrogantly told one person who asked a question that they were incapable of comprehending the health care bill. At another town hall meeting earlier this year, you laughed at an attendee who disagreed with you on cap and tax, apparently trying to publicly humiliate him.

Mr. Boucher, I have something to tell you: You work for us. We are not your subjects. You do not rule over us, you represent us. You are not His Royal Highness Boucher. We have the right to disagree with you, and to speak to you about the major issues currently facing our country. We have the right to be treated with dignity and respect by you and your staff even if we disagree with you on the issues.

Let me remind you that our hard earned money pays your very high Congressman’s salary. Our money pays your gold-plated health care coverage; your generous travel budget; your plentiful staff and offices; and your lucrative retirement plan. While we are having to cut our household budgets and find ways to scrimp and save during these lean economic times, you do not. Have you given yourself a pay cut, cut back on your staff, cut back on your travel, cut back on expenses, or cut back on anything?

Perhaps your twenty-seven years in Washington have put you out of touch. Perhaps you now think you are above us.

You thumbed your nose at us by voting for cap and tax, a bill that is specifically designed to bankrupt the coal industry and cause electricity rates to skyrocket (as stated by President Obama). You will no doubt eventually vote for some form of government take-over of health care, even though we have made it clear  we don’t want it in any form. You support abortion; we don’t. You supported the trillion dollar boondoggle stimulus that we were told would keep unemployment no higher than eight percent but it is now over ten percent; we didn’t and still don’t. You supported the multiple bailouts costing hundreds of billions of dollars each; we didn’t. You believe in the global warming hoax; we know that it is a hoax. You support the radical policies of Obama; we don’t.

Last summer when the tea parties were going on, your colleagues in Washington called us a mob, nazis, astroturf, dangerous people, and other vile names; you stood idly by and said nothing in our defense.

You work for us.

Jessee Ring   

Dec. 9, 2009

Sunday, November 29, 2009

In God We Trust

One of the reasons this country was founded was because people wanted to escape the religious persecution that was quite common in England and Europe at the time. In many countries, if you weren’t of a specified religion, you became a target. Therefore, the founding fathers were very wary of there being any sort of an “official” religion in the United States. They wanted to make sure that, here, people would be free to choose their religion on their own, rather than have the government impose something on them. The very first Amendment to the U. S. Constitution does just that:


Amendments To The Constitution of the United States

Amendment I

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting  the free exercise thereof; ---.”


The criterion that was being set was the prevention of a government established religion. That’s why this part of the first amendment is called the “establishment clause”.

Somehow, that principal of there being no government established, official religion has expanded to the point now where, for example, prayer before a high school football game has been ruled unconstitutional. Some other court rulings seem to imply that there can be no public display of anything religious. People cite a letter that Thomas Jefferson wrote saying that the wall between church and state must be high and wide, as the reason for such court rulings.

But to suggest that the founding fathers intended to prohibit any public expression of religion is in direct opposition to their own actions in that realm.

Consider the 1789 Thanksgiving Proclamation of President George Washington:


George Washington’s 1789 Thanksgiving Proclamation

“Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly implore His protection and favor, and Whereas both Houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me to ‘recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness:’

Now, therefore, I do recommend and assign Thursday, the 26th. day of November next, to be devoted by the people of these States to the service of that great and glorious Being who is the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country previous to their becoming a nation; for the signal and manifold mercies and the favorable interpositions of His providence in the course and conclusion of the late war; for the great degree of tranquility, union, and plenty which we have since enjoyed; for the peaceable and rational manner in which we have been able to establish constitutions of government for our safety and happiness, and particularly the national one now lately instituted for the civil and religious liberty with which we are blessed, and the means we have of acquiring and diffusing useful knowledge; and, in general, for all the great and various favors which He has been pleased to confer upon us.

And also that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations and beseech Him  to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.”


Given under my hand, at the city of New York, the 3rd day of October, A.D 1789

G. Washington


That sounds a lot like a sermon, to me, and it came as a public proclamation from a sitting President of the United States.

During the depths of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln wrote his version:


                           Abraham Lincoln’s 1863 Thanksgiving Proclamation

“The year that is drawing toward its close has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God. In the midst of a civil war of unequalled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union. Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defense, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle, or the ship; the axe has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and mines, as well or iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore. Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battlefield, and the country, rejoicing in the consciousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.

No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things. They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and voice by the whole American People. I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens. And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners, or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidable engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquility, and Union.”

 Abraham Lincoln

Oct. 3, 1863


This one seems more like prayer, again issued as a public proclamation by a sitting President.

This country was founded by devoutly religious people who wanted religious freedom; they were in no way trying to eradicate religion from public life. We have many problems in today’s society with such issues as drugs, teenage pregnancy, gangs, and others. These are not brought about by too much religious influence, but rather by too little.


Jessee Ring

Nov. 22, 2009

Friday, November 20, 2009

We're Not In 2008 Anymore

Toto has pulled the curtain back and revealed The Wizard of Obama to be nothing more than a huckster pulling levers, blowing smoke, and talking into a microphone.

Bob McDonnell, Bill Bolling, and Ken Cuccinelli were elected Governor, Lieutenant Governor, and Attorney General respectively of Virginia by a landslide last week. They didn’t just win, they crushed the opposition. McDonnell got 58% of the vote to 41% for his opponent (Creigh Deeds). That’s an astounding 17% margin, and the largest percentage of the vote for a governor in Virginia since 1961. In the absolute magnitude of the vote count, McDonnell’s 1,161,724 votes are the largest number of votes any candidate for governor in Virginia has ever received! Ever.

McDonnell and team ran an issues based campaign in which they proposed common sense conservative solutions to the matters of concern to Virginians. The most important aspect of that statement is the word “conservative”. McDonnell and Bolling and Cuccinelli are all grounded in the conservative principles of small government, low taxes, free enterprise, individual liberty, personal responsibility, and traditional American values. And they won in a rout.

In New Jersey, Chris Christie, a Republican, beat an incumbent Democrat governor in another landslide. We’re talking New Jersey, a very Democrat state, where dead people have been known to arise and vote for the Democrat when the race is tight, and where other such shenanigans are not uncommon. But the Republican won handily.

In an upstate New York congressional district, a complete unknown running as the Conservative Party candidate lost narrowly to the Democrat. This result was due to the total chaos that erupted within the Republican Party when, in traditional smoke-filled back room politics manner, the local Republican party bosses put up a candidate who was so liberal that a palace revolt occurred among the Republicans. This ultra-liberal Republican candidate withdrew and endorsed the Democrat (yes, the Republican candidate endorsed the Democrat), throwing the election to him. In spite of all of this complete pandemonium, the Conservative Party candidate almost won, and if the Republicans had nominated him in the first place, he no doubt would have won easily.

On election night, when he was asked if he was going to watch the election returns, Obama, in Marie Antoinette “let them eat cake” style, said no, he was going to watch a basketball game.

The Obama protectors in the media are now busily proclaiming that none of these elections results were in any way a referendum on Obama, but rather they turned strictly on local issues.


In election exit polls last week, when asked what was their number one concern, voters overwhelmingly said it was the economy. Well, the economy is certainly a national,  not a local,  issue. And who is “economist in chief” now?

The Democrats need to bring Bill Clinton back. Remember, “It’s the economy, stupid”?

What about cap-and–trade? There’s no doubt that that national issue was also important in the Virginia election.

Health care? Of course that spilled over into the state elections.

Taxes were a huge issue in the Virginia election, and many people are also concerned about potential tax increases from Washington.

I don’t think Obama and his acolytes are so clueless as to really believe this nonsense about the 2009 election not saying anything about Obama, but I hope they are. That means we can blind-side them again in 2010 and 2012.

There are three main lessons to be learned from the recent election.

The overall lesson is that the Presidential election in 2008 was an anomaly. It happened the way it did due to a once-in-a-lifetime combination of events. There was an unpopular Republican incumbent President; people were very dissatisfied with the way things were going in Iraq; the economy was tanking in a frightening manner; the Democrats found a smooth talking, cool dude; the Republican candidate was inept and sometimes downright flakey; the media became the Democrats’ cheerleading squad; and many people got caught up in the historical moment of the first African-American President. The planets were all in alignment, but it was a fluke brought about by conditions that will never occur again.

For the Democrats, the lesson from the 2009 election is that if they continue to follow the pied piper of Obama, they will march off into oblivion.

For Republicans, the lesson is that when they have candidates who unabashedly run on true conservative principles instead of away from them, who clearly articulate common sense conservative solutions to the issues of the day, and who stay on message, they win.


Jessee Ring

Nov. 7, 2009